4.5 Article

Depletion of thiol-containing proteins in response to quinones in Bacillus subtilis

期刊

MOLECULAR MICROBIOLOGY
卷 69, 期 6, 页码 1513-1529

出版社

WILEY
DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-2958.2008.06382.x

关键词

-

资金

  1. Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft
  2. Bundesministerium fur Bildung und Forschung [BACELL-SysMo 031397A]
  3. Fonds der Chemischen Industrie
  4. Bildungsministerium of the country Mecklenburg-Vorpommern
  5. European Union BACELL-Health [LSHG-CT-2004-503468]
  6. BACELL-BaSysBio [LSHG-CT-2006-037469]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Quinones are highly toxic naturally occurring thiol-reactive compounds. We have previously described novel pathways for quinone detoxification in the Gram-positive bacterium Bacillus subtilis. In this study, we have investigated the extent of irreversible and reversible thiol modifications caused in vivo by electrophilic quinones. Exposure to toxic benzoquinone (BQ) concentrations leads to depletion of numerous Cys-rich cytoplasmic proteins in the proteome of B. subtilis. Mass spectrometry and immunoblot analyses demonstrated that these BQ-depleted proteins represent irreversibly damaged BQ aggregates that escape the two-dimensional gel separation. This enabled us to quantify the depletion of thiol-containing proteins which are the in vivo targets for thiol-(S)-alkylation by toxic quinone compounds. Metabolomic approaches confirmed that protein depletion is accompanied by depletion of the low-molecular-weight (LMW) thiol cysteine. Finally, no increased formation of disulphide bonds was detected in the thiol-redox proteome in response to sublethal quinone concentrations. The glyceraldehyde-3-phosphate dehydrogenase (GapA) was identified as the only new target for reversible thiol modifications after exposure to toxic quinones. Together our data show that the thiol-(S)-alkylation reaction with protein and non-protein thiols is the in vivo mechanism for thiol depletion and quinone toxicity in B. subtilis and most likely also in other bacteria.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据