3.9 Article

The Equilibrative Nucleoside Transporter (ENT1) can be phosphorylated at multiple sites by PKC and PKA

期刊

MOLECULAR MEMBRANE BIOLOGY
卷 28, 期 6, 页码 412-426

出版社

INFORMA HEALTHCARE
DOI: 10.3109/09687688.2011.604861

关键词

ENT1; phosphorylation; regulation; kinase; PKA; PKC

资金

  1. Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council, Canada [RGPIN - 203397]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Equilibrative Nucleoside Transporters (SLC29) are a family of proteins that transport nucleosides, nucleobases and nucleoside analogue drugs across cellular membranes. ENT1 is expressed ubiquitously in mammalian tissues and responsible for a significant portion of nucleoside analog drug uptake in humans. Despite the important clinical role of ENT1, many aspects of the regulation of this protein remain unknown. A major outstanding question in this field is the whether ENT1 is phosphorylated directly. To answer this question, we overexpressed tagged human (h) and mouse (m) ENT1, affinity purified protein using the tag, conducted phosphoamino acid analysis and found that m/hENT1 is predominantly phosphorylated at serine residues. The large intracellular loop of ENT1, between transmembrane domains 6 and 7, has been suggested to be a site of regulation by phosphorylation, therefore we generated His/Ubiquitin tagged peptides of this region and used them for in vitro kinase assays to identify target serines. Our data support a role for PKA and PKC in the phosphorylation of ENT1 within the intracellular loop and show that PKA can phosphorylate multiple sites within this loop while PKC specifically targets serines 279 and 286 and threonine 274. These data demonstrate, for the first time, that ENT1 is a phosphoprotein that can be directly phosphorylated at several sites by more than one kinase. The presence of multiple kinase targets within the loop suggests that ENT1 phosphorylation is considerably more complex than previously thought and thus ENT1 may be subject to phosphorylation by multiple pathways.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

3.9
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据