4.5 Article

High glucose induces activation of the local renin-angiotensin system in glomerular endothelial cells

期刊

MOLECULAR MEDICINE REPORTS
卷 9, 期 2, 页码 450-456

出版社

SPANDIDOS PUBL LTD
DOI: 10.3892/mmr.2013.1855

关键词

angiotensin II; diabetic kidney disease; renin angiotensin; glomerular endothelial cell

资金

  1. National Natural Science Funds of China [30800408, 30771011]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Activation of the intrarenal renin-angiotensin system (RAS), which has been identified in podocytes and mesangial cells, is a novel mechanism in the progression of diabetic kidney disease (DKD). The present study aimed to identify the local RAS in glomerular endothelial cells (GEnCs). Rat GEnCs were stimulated by culture medium containing 30 mmol/l glucose for 12, 24, 48 and 72 h. Angiotensin II (Ang II) concentrations in cell lysates and culture media were examined by ELISA and mRNA levels of angiotensinogen and renin in cell lysates were analyzed by quantitative polymerase chain reaction. Ang II type 1 receptor (AT1R), Ang II type 2 receptor (AT2R), renin and angiotensinogen levels in cell lysates were determined by western blot analysis. Localization of intracellular AT1R, AT2R, angiotensinogen and renin was identified by confocal immunofluorescence microscopy. Consequently, high glucose (HG) increased intracellular and extracellular Ang II levels. Captopril and chymostatin (inhibitor of chymase, an enzyme that converts Ang I to Ang II) were able to antagonize HG-induced Ang II generation. Moreover, HG increased angiotensinogen production in GEnCs and reduced renin mRNA expression without altering renin protein production. However, HG decreased AT1R levels and resulted in AT2R shifting from the nuclear to perinuclear region in GEnCs. In conclusion, HG activated the intracellular RAS in rat GEnCs and the underlying mechanism may involve angiotensin-converting enzyme (ACE) and non-ACE pathways. The effects of HG on GEnCs may also involve the substrate and receptors of Ang II.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据