4.5 Article

Crocetin induces apoptosis of BGC-823 human gastric cancer cells

期刊

MOLECULAR MEDICINE REPORTS
卷 9, 期 2, 页码 521-526

出版社

SPANDIDOS PUBL LTD
DOI: 10.3892/mmr.2013.1851

关键词

crocetin; BGC-823 human gastric cancer cells; apoptosis; mitochondrial pathway

资金

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [30600524, 81071990]
  2. Science and Technology Planning Projects of Guangdong [2010B080701088]
  3. Science and Technology Projects of Guangzhou [2011J410010]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Gastric cancer (GC) is one of the most common types of gastrointestinal tumors worldwide, and the side effects of chemotherapeutic drugs and the resistance to chemotherapy remain problematic in its clinical treatment. Therefore, safe and effective novel agents are urgently required. The purpose of the present study was to investigate the crocetin-sensitive treatment of GC and its possible mechanisms. BGC-823 human GC cells were treated with crocetin. The effects of crocetin on the viability of the cells were determined by the 3-(4,5-dimethylthiazol-2-yl)-2,5-diphenyltetrazolium bromide assay. Hoechst 33258 dyeing and Rh123 staining were used to detect cell apoptosis. The BGC-823 cells were subjected to western blotting analysis for detection of cytochrome c and cleaved caspase-3 protein expression. Crocetin inhibited the proliferation of the GC cell line in a dose- and time-dependent manner. Apoptotic BGC-823 cells induced by crocetin were stained by Hoechst 33258 and observed under a light microscope for cell membrane staining of dense nuclei, nuclear pyknosis, fragmentation, chromatin condensation and highlighted nuclear membrane staining. This revealed a decline in the mitochondrial membrane potential of the BGC-823 cells. Crocetin also induced caspase-3 activation and cytochrome c translocation into the cytosol from the mitochondria. The results of this study indicate that crocetin induces the apoptosis of BGC-823 cells, and may be used as an effective agent in the treatment of GC.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据