4.5 Article

Naringin inhibits chemokine production in an LPS-induced RAW 264.7 macrophage cell line

期刊

MOLECULAR MEDICINE REPORTS
卷 6, 期 6, 页码 1343-1350

出版社

SPANDIDOS PUBL LTD
DOI: 10.3892/mmr.2012.1072

关键词

naringin; lipopolysaccharide; interleukin-8; monocyte chemoattractant protein-1; macrophage inflammatory protein-1 alpha; nuclear factor-kappa B; mitogen-activated protein kinase

资金

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [81173475]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Naringin has been reported to act as an effective anti-inflammatory compound. In a previous study, we demonstrated that the anti-inflammatory effect of naringin on lipopolysaccharide (LPS)-induced acute lung injury in mice correlated with the inhibition of the nuclear factor-kappa B (NF-kappa B) pathway. However, the effects and mechanism of action of naringin on LPS-induced chemokine expression are not yet fully understood. This study aimed to evaluate the effect of naringin on chemokine expression in LPS-induced RAW 264.7 macrophages and to provide insights into the possible underlying mechanisms. We found that the in vitro pre-treatment with naringin led to a significant attenuation in the LPS-induced secretion of interleukin-8 (IL-8), monocyte chemoattractant protein-1 (MCP-1) and macrophage inflammatory protein-la (MIP-1 alpha). RT-qPCR demonstrated that naringin significantly reduced the LPS-induced upregulation of IL-8, MCP-1 and MIP-1 alpha mRNA expression in a dose-dependent manner. Additionally, western blot analysis revealed that naringin effectively suppressed NF-kappa B activation by inhibiting the degradation of I kappa B-alpha and the translocation of p65. Naringin also attenuated MAPK activation by inhibiting the phosphorylation of ERK1/2, JNK and p38 MAPK. Taken together, these demonstrate that naringin reduces IL-8, MCP-I and MIP-1 alpha secretion and mRNA expression, possibly by blocking the activation of the NF-kappa B and MAPK signaling pathways in LPS-induced RAW 264.7 macrophages.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据