4.5 Article

Increased NRF2 gene (NFE2L2) copy number correlates with mutations in lung squamous cell carcinomas

期刊

MOLECULAR MEDICINE REPORTS
卷 6, 期 2, 页码 391-394

出版社

SPANDIDOS PUBL LTD
DOI: 10.3892/mmr.2012.921

关键词

nuclear factor (erythroid-derived 2)-like 2; lung cancer; squamous cell carcinoma; copy number; mutation

资金

  1. Japan Society for the Promotion of Science (JSPS) [23659674, 24592097, 21591820]
  2. Ministry of Education, Culture, Sports, Science and Technology of Japan

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Nuclear factor (erythroid-derived 2)-like 2 (NRF2) is a transcription factor belonging to the cap 'n' collar subfamily of the basic-leucine zipper (bZIP) family of transcription factors, which plays a significant role in adaptive responses to oxidative stress. Previously, we reported that NRF2 gene (NFE2L2) mutations correlate with poor prognosis of lung squamous cell carcinomas. We therefore hypothesized that an increased NRF2 gene copy number may correlate with clinicopathological features in lung cancer patients. In this study, the increased copy number of the NRF2 gene was analyzed by real-time polymerase chain reaction (real-time-PCR) amplifications in 90 surgically-treated non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) cases. In total, 16 NRF2 mutation cases were included. An increased NRF2 gene copy number was found in 7 (7.8%) lung squamous cell carcinoma patients. Increased NRF2 copy number status significantly correlated with mutation status (mutant, 31.25% vs. wild-type, 2.7%; p=0.0017). The mean NRF2 gene copy number was significantly higher in mutant (2.478+/-0.668) compared to wild-type NRF2 (1.917+/-0.737) (p=0.0048). However, the copy number did not correlate with smoking status (p=0.3741), gender (p=0.1545), age (>= 65 vs. <65, p=0.1237) and pathological stage. Although an increased NRF2 copy number correlates with mutations in squamous cell carcinoma, the percentage of the increased copy number was low; therefore, another mechanism may exist for the activation of NRF2 mutations in cancer.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据