4.7 Article

Bone-Targeting Endogenous Secretory Receptor for Advanced Glycation End Products Rescues Rheumatoid Arthritis

期刊

MOLECULAR MEDICINE
卷 19, 期 -, 页码 183-194

出版社

SPRINGER
DOI: 10.2119/molmed.2012.00309

关键词

-

资金

  1. Ministry of Education, Culture, Sports, Science and Technology of Japan [20790150]
  2. Grants-in-Aid for Scientific Research [20790150] Funding Source: KAKEN

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Rheumatoid arthritis (RA) is a chronic inflammatory synovitis that leads to the destruction of bone and cartilage. The receptor for advanced glycation end products (RAGE) is a multiligand membrane-bound receptor for high-mobility group box-1 (HMGB1) associated with development of RA by inducing production of proinflammatory cytokines such as tumor necrosis factor (TNF)-alpha, interleukin (IL)-1 and IL-6. We developed a bone-targeting therapeutic agent by tagging acidic oligopeptide to a nonmembrane-bound form of RAGE (endogenous secretory RAGE [esRAGE]) functioning as a decoy receptor. We assessed its tissue distribution and therapeutic effectiveness in a murine model of collagen-induced arthritis (CIA). Acidic oligopeptide-tagged esRAGE (D-6-esRAGE) was localized to mineralized region in bone, resulting in the prolonged retention of more than 1 wk. Weekly administration of D-6-esRAGE with a dose of 1 mg/kg to RA model mice significantly ameliorated inflammatory arthritis, synovial hyperplasia, cartilage destruction and bone destruction, while untagged esRAGE showed little effectiveness. Moreover, D-6-esRAGE reduced plasma levels of proinflammatory cytokines including TNF-alpha, IL-1 and IL-6, while esRAGE reduced the levels of IL-1 and IL-6 to a lesser extent, suggesting that production of IL-1 and IL-6 reduced along the blockade of HMGB1 receptor downstream signals by D-6-esRAGE could be attributed to remission of CIA. These findings indicate that D-6-esRAGE enhances drug delivery to bone, leading to rescue of clinical and pathological lesions in murine CIA.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据