4.7 Article

Selective Antihypertensive Dihydropyridines Lower Aβ Accumulation by Targeting both the Production and the Clearance of Aβ across the Blood-Brain Barrier

期刊

MOLECULAR MEDICINE
卷 17, 期 3-4, 页码 149-162

出版社

SPRINGER
DOI: 10.2119/molmed.2010.00180

关键词

-

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Several large population-based or clinical trial studies have suggested that certain dihydropyridine (DHP) L-type calcium channel blockers (CCBs) used for the treatment of hypertension may confer protection against the development of Alzheimer disease (AD). However, other studies with drugs of the same class have shown no beneficial clinical effects. To determine whether certain DHPs are able to impact underlying disease processes in AD (specifically the accumulation of the Alzheimer A beta peptide), we investigated the effect of several antihypertensive DHPs and non-DHP CCBs on A beta production. Among the antihypertensive DHPs tested, a few, including nilvadipine, nitrendipine and amlodipine inhibited A beta production in vitro, whereas others had no effect or raised A beta levels. In vivo, nilvadipine and nitrendipine acutely reduced brain A beta levels in a transgenic mouse model of AD (Tg PS1/APPsw) and improved A beta clearance across the blood-brain barrier (BBB), whereas amlodipine and nifedipine were ineffective showing that the A beta-lowering activity of the DHPs is independent of their antihypertensive activity. Chronic oral treatment with nilvadipine decreased A beta burden in the brains of Tg APPsw (Tg2576) and Tg PS1/APPsw mice, and also improved learning abilities and spatial memory. Our data suggest that the clinical benefit conferred by certain antihypertensive DHPs against AD is unrelated to their antihypertensive activity, but rely on their ability to lower brain A beta accumulation by affecting both A beta production and A beta clearance across the BBB. (C) 2011 The Feinstein Institute for Medical Research, www.feinsteininstitute.org Online address: http://www.molmed.org doi: 10.2119/molmed.2010.00180

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据