4.5 Review

Redundant and specialized roles for diacylglycerol kinases α and ζ in the control of T cell functions

期刊

SCIENCE SIGNALING
卷 8, 期 374, 页码 -

出版社

AMER ASSOC ADVANCEMENT SCIENCE
DOI: 10.1126/scisignal.aaa0974

关键词

-

资金

  1. FPU (Formacion de Profesorado Universitario) fellowship from the Spanish Ministry of Education
  2. Spanish Anti-Cancer Association
  3. Madrid regional government
  4. Madrid regional government [S2010/BMD-2305]
  5. Spanish Ministry of Economy and Competitivity [BFU2013-47640-P]
  6. Spanish Ministry of Health (Instituto de Salud Carlos III) [RD12/0036/0059]
  7. Madrid regional government (IMMUNOTHERCAM) [S2010/BMD-2326]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The diacylglycerol kinases (DGKs) attenuate diacylglycerol (DAG)-mediated signals by catalyzing the conversion of DAG to phosphatidic acid. In T lymphocytes, the antigen-stimulated generation of DAG links signal strength to the intensity and duration of signaling by theRas-extracellular signal-regulated kinase (ERK) and protein kinaseC(PKC)-dependent pathways. The generation of DAG at the plasma membrane of T cells lies at the core of the mechanisms that delimit T cell functions. DGK alpha and DGK zeta are the two main isoforms that are found in T cells, and several approaches define their precise contribution to T cell responses. Each of these isoforms has specialized and redundant functions that limit the intensity of DAG-regulated signals downstream of antigenic stimulation. This ability, which in normal T cells contributes to maintaining homeostasis and function, is exploited by tumors to evade immune surveillance. Modification of DGK activity offers new perspectives for the therapeutic manipulation of T cell functions for treatment of autoimmune pathologies, or for overcoming tumor-induced T cell tolerance. Precise knowledge of the mechanisms that sustain DGK isoform-specific regulation in T lymphocytes is indispensable for the development of new tools for pharmacological intervention.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据