4.5 Review

Mechanisms of immune dysfunction and bacterial persistence in non-cystic fibrosis bronchiectasis

期刊

MOLECULAR IMMUNOLOGY
卷 55, 期 1, 页码 27-34

出版社

PERGAMON-ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.molimm.2012.09.011

关键词

Immunity; Bronchiectasis; Bacteria; Neutrophil; Pseudomonas

资金

  1. Medical Research Council, UK
  2. MRC [G0800428] Funding Source: UKRI
  3. Medical Research Council [G0800428] Funding Source: researchfish

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Bronchiectasis is a chronic inflammatory lung disease. The underlying cause is not identified in the majority of patients, but bronchiectasis is associated with a number of severe infections, immunodeficiencies and autoimmune disorders. Regardless of the underlying cause, the disease is characterised by a vicious cycle of bacterial colonisation, airway inflammation and airway structural damage. Inflammation in bronchiectasis is predominantly neutrophil driven. Neutrophils migrate to the airway under the action of pro-inflammatory cytokines such as interleukin-8, tumour necrosis factor-alpha and interleukin-1 beta, all of which are increased in the airway of patients with bronchiectasis. Bacterial infection persists in the airway despite large numbers of neutrophils that would be expected to phagocytose and kill pathogens under normal circumstances. Evidence suggests that neutrophils are disabled by multiple mechanisms including cleavage of phagocytic receptors by neutrophil elastase and inhibition of phagocytosis by neutrophil peptides. Complement activation is impaired and neutrophil elastase may cleave activated complement from pathogens preventing effective opsonisation. Organisms also evade clearance by adapting to chronic infection. The formation of biofilms, reduced motility and the down-regulation of virulence factors are among the strategies used to subvert innate immune mechanisms. Greater understanding of the mechanisms underlying chronic colonisation in bronchiectasis will assist in the development of new treatments for this important disease. (C) 2012 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据