4.5 Article

Carbon monoxide, a reaction product of heme oxygenase-1, suppresses the expression of C-reactive protein by endoplasmic reticulum stress through modulation of the unfolded protein response

期刊

MOLECULAR IMMUNOLOGY
卷 48, 期 15-16, 页码 1793-1799

出版社

PERGAMON-ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.molimm.2011.05.014

关键词

Heme oxygenase-1; Carbon monoxide; Endoplasmic reticulum stress; C-reactive protein

资金

  1. Korea Research Foundation
  2. Korean Government (MOEHRD) [BRL-2010-0087350]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The expression of C-reactive protein (CRP) rises rapidly in response to inflammation. The endoplasmic reticulum (ER) stress has been reported to cause CRP expression. Carbon monoxide (CO), a reaction product of heme oxygenase, exerts anti-inflammatory effects. In this study, we aimed to examine the role of CO in modulating ER stress-induced CRP expression. In HepG2 cells, ER stress triggered by tunicamycin, thapsigargin and homocysteine markedly induced CRP expression and the activation of protein kinase R-like endoplasmic reticulum kinase (PERK), inositol-requiring transmembrane kinase/endonuclease la (IRE1 alpha), activating transcription factor 6 (ATF6), and hepatocyte-specific cyclic AMP response element binding protein H (CREBH). A CO-releasing molecule (CORM) inhibited ER stress-induced CRP expression. While CORM attenuated ER stress-induced activation of IRE1 alpha, ATF6 and CREBH, it augmented PERK activation, which was associated with its inhibition of CRP expression. CORM also inhibited CRP expression in response to the pro-inflammatory cytokine IL-6 that was found to induce ER stress response in HepG2 cells. Moreover, in mice treated with the ER stress inducer tunicamycin, CORM administration reduced serum levels of CRP and the expression of CRP mRNA in the liver. Collectively, our findings suggest that CO may attenuate ER stress-induced CRP expression through modulation of the unfolded protein response. (C) 2011 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据