4.5 Article

IL-21 and IL-15 cytokine DNA augments HSV specific effector and memory CD8+ T cell response

期刊

MOLECULAR IMMUNOLOGY
卷 46, 期 7, 页码 1494-1504

出版社

PERGAMON-ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.molimm.2008.12.033

关键词

IL-21; IL-15; Memory; CD8(+) T cells; Herpes virus; DNA vaccination

资金

  1. NIH [AI 106336501]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The recurrence of lesions and transmission of Herpes simplex virus is dependent on the number and function of viral specific CD8(+) T cells, especially the memory T cells. The generation, turnover and set point of this cell population is maintained by different factors like exposure to antigen, cytokines and co-stimulatory molecules. However, the contribution of these factors in the generation and maintenance of the memory CD8(+) T cell population is still controversial, since it is not clear if homeostatic proliferation driven by cytokines can overcome T cell receptor (TCR) signaling. Since, interleukin 15 (IL-15) and interleukin 21 (IL-21) are cytokines implicated in homeostatic control of CD8(+) T cell pool, we constructed and used expression plasmids coding for IL-15 (pIL-15) and IL-21 (plL-21) to expand HSV specific CD8(+) T cells in an animal model. Our results showed that the IL-21 increased the frequency of CD8(+) T cells in the absence of antigen, although the magnitude of this response was dependent on TCR signaling. Both pIL-15 and plL-21 boosted the numbers of antigen specific CD8(+) IFN gamma producing cells in the primary response. In the memory phase, numbers of CD8(+) CD44(high) as well as CD8(+) T cells producing IFN-gamma and TNF-alpha were increased when pIL-15 and pIL-21 were used alone or in combination, compared to vector treatment only, and association of antigen further increased the proliferative response. Our data suggest that genetic treatment with pIL-15 and pIL-21 in the presence or absence of cognate antigen can contribute to immune-enhancement against HSV. (C) 2009 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据