4.7 Article

Bacterial community variation and microbial mechanism of triclosan (TCS) removal by constructed wetlands with different types of plants

期刊

SCIENCE OF THE TOTAL ENVIRONMENT
卷 505, 期 -, 页码 633-639

出版社

ELSEVIER SCIENCE BV
DOI: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2014.10.053

关键词

Constructed wetlands; Triclosan; Microbial community; Microbial removal mechanism; Plant species effect

资金

  1. National Science Foundation of China [21007032, 21307078]
  2. National Water Special Project [2012ZX07203-004]
  3. Independent Innovation Foundation of Shandong University [2014JC023]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Triclosan (TCS) broad-spectrum synthetic antimicrobial agent that is toxic to microbes and other aquatic organisms. Constructed wetlands (CWs) are now popular in TCS removal. However, knowledge on the effects of TCS on the bacterial community and microbial removal mechanism in CWs is lacking. The effects of TCS (60 mu g L-1) on bacterial communities in batch-loaded CWs with emergent (Typha angustifolia), submerged (Hydrilla verticillata), and floating plant (Salvinia natans) were analyzed by 454 pyrosequencing technology. After six periods of experiment, the TCS removal efficiencies were over 90% in CWs, and negative effects of TCS on bacterial community richness and diversity were observed. Moreover, plant species effect existed. Bacterial strains that contributed to TCS biodegradation in CWs were successfully identified. In TCS-treated T. angustifolia and H. verticillata CWs, beta-Proteobacteria increased by 16.63% and 18.20%, respectively. In TCS-treated S. natans CWs, delta- and gamma-Proteobacteria and Sphingobacteria increased by 9.36%, 19.49%, and 31.37%, respectively, and could relate to TCS biodegradation. TCS affected the development of certain bacteria, and eventually, the bacterial community structures in CWs. This research provided ecologically relevant information on bacterial community and microbial removal mechanism in CWs under TCS treatment. (C) 2014 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据