4.5 Article

Spatial distribution of histone methylation during MHC class II expression

期刊

MOLECULAR IMMUNOLOGY
卷 45, 期 4, 页码 971-980

出版社

PERGAMON-ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.molimm.2007.07.039

关键词

CIITA; MHC class II; trichostatin a; histone acetylation; histone methylation

资金

  1. NCI NIH HHS [R01 CA124971, P30 CA016056] Funding Source: Medline
  2. NICHD NIH HHS [HD17013, R01 HD017013, R01 HD017013-19] Funding Source: Medline

向作者/读者索取更多资源

We have previously reported that Major Histocompatibility Complex (MHC) class II can be induced by histone deacetylase inhibitors (HDACi) in the absence of class II transactivator (CIITA). Here we characterized the histone modifications associated with the CIITA-dependent (IFN-gamma induced) and -independent (HDACi induced) MHC class II expression. We demonstrate that both IFN-gamma and HDACi induced MHC class II expression exhibited enhanced histone H3, H4 acetylation and H3K4me3 at the MHC class II promoter while H3K9me3 was decreased. In contrast, high levels of H3K36me3 were detected at exons 3 and 5 but not at the promoter or the locus control region (LCR). Interestingly, high levels of H3K79me2 were only detected at the promoter and exon 3 of the B cell lines while the level remained low and unchanged despite active MHC class II expression induced by either IFN-gamma or HDACi treatment. Constitutive expression of the CIITA protein by stable transfection of a CIITA deficient B cell line restored the H3K79me2 to a level comparable to its cell of origin. This data demonstrates that, although regulated by different pathways, both IFN-gamma and HDACi treatments resulted in similar patterns of histone modifications and that HDACi induce both histone methylation and acetylation. In addition, the different spatial distribution of the lysine methylation markers along the gene suggests that these modifications play a distinctive role during different phases of the transcription process. (c) 2007 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据