4.4 Article

PET Imaging of Stroke-Induced Neuroinflammation in Mice Using [18F]PBR06

期刊

MOLECULAR IMAGING AND BIOLOGY
卷 16, 期 1, 页码 109-117

出版社

SPRINGER
DOI: 10.1007/s11307-013-0664-5

关键词

Stroke; Neuroinflammation; Translocator protein 18 kDa (TSPO); Peripheral benzodiazepine receptor (PBR); Positron emission tomography (PET); [F-18]PBR06

资金

  1. Bio-X Interdisciplinary Initiatives Program (IIP) award from Stanford University
  2. Developmental Cancer Research Award (DCRA) in Translational Research from Stanford Cancer Institute
  3. NCI ICMIC [CA114747]
  4. American Heart Association [AHA-0835274]
  5. CIRM [RC1-0134]
  6. National Research Foundation of Korea
  7. Ministry of Education, Science and Technology, Korea [R31-10105, NRF-2012M3A9C6049796]
  8. Department of Radiation Oncology, Stanford University

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The purpose of this study is to evaluate the 18 kDa translocator protein (TSPO) radioligand [F-18]N-fluoroacetyl-N-(2,5-dimethoxybenzyl)-2-phenoxyaniline ([F-18]PBR06) as a positron emission tomography (PET) imaging biomarker of stroke-induced neuroinflammation in a rodent model. Stroke was induced by transient middle cerebral artery occlusion in Balb/c mice. Dynamic PET/CT imaging with displacement and preblocking using PK111195 was performed 3 days later. PET data were correlated with immunohistochemistry (IHC) for the activated microglial markers TSPO and CD68 and with autoradiography. [F-18]PBR06 accumulation peaked within the first 5 min postinjection, then decreased gradually, remaining significantly higher in infarct compared to noninfarct regions. Displacement or preblocking with PK11195 eliminated the difference in [F-18]PBR06 uptake between infarct and noninfarct regions. Autoradiography and IHC correlated well spatially with uptake on PET. [F-18]PBR06 PET specifically images TSPO in microglial neuroinflammation in a mouse model of stroke and shows promise for imaging and monitoring microglial activation/neuroinflammation in other disease models.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.4
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据