4.4 Article

In Vivo pH Imaging with 99mTc-pHLIP

期刊

MOLECULAR IMAGING AND BIOLOGY
卷 14, 期 6, 页码 725-734

出版社

SPRINGER
DOI: 10.1007/s11307-012-0549-z

关键词

Molecular imaging; pHLIP; Tc-99m; SPECT; Extracellular pH; AH114567; 3-APP; Maraciclatide; Preclinical

资金

  1. NCI NIH HHS [R01 CA133890] Funding Source: Medline
  2. NIGMS NIH HHS [R01 GM073857] Funding Source: Medline

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Purpose: A novel molecular imaging agent has been developed recently, which stains tissues of low extracellular pH [pH (low) insertion peptide, pHLIP (R)]. A pH-dependent process of peptide folding and insertion into cell membranes has been found in vitro. Targeting of acidic solid tumours has been demonstrated in vivo using fluorescence and PET labels. Here, we present proof of feasibility studies of pHLIP with a single-photon emission computed tomography (SPECT) label, Tc-99m-AH114567, with focus on preclinical efficacy and imageability. Procedures: Lewis lung carcinoma, lymph node carcinoma of the prostate and prostate adenocarcinoma tumour xenografts were grown in mice and characterised by the angiogenesis marker Tc-99m-NC100692 and by extracellular pH measurements with P-31-MRS of 3-aminopropyl phosphonate. Biodistribution was assessed and CT/SPECT imaging performed. Oral administration of bicarbonate served as control. Results and Conclusion: Tc-AH114567 can be obtained via a robust synthesis with good radiolabelling profile and improved formulation. The tracer retains the pH-dependent ability to insert into membranes and to target tumours with similar pharmacokinetics and efficacy that had been demonstrated earlier for pHLIP with optical or Cu-64 PET labels. Despite the inherent challenges of SPECT compared to optical and PET imaging, e.g., in terms of lower sensitivity, Tc-99m-AH114567 shows adequate image quality and contrast. The main development need for transitioning SPECT labelled pHLIP into the clinic is more rapid background signal reduction, which will be the focus of a subsequent optimisation study.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.4
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据