4.7 Article

Drought and soil amendment effects on monoterpene emission in rosemary plants

期刊

SCIENCE OF THE TOTAL ENVIRONMENT
卷 538, 期 -, 页码 768-778

出版社

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2015.08.080

关键词

Anaerobic digestate derived-compost; Organic amendments; Rosmarinus officinalis L.; Biogenic volatile organic compounds; Abiotic stress

资金

  1. Transnational Access to Research Infrastructures activity in EC 7th Framework Programme under the Experimentation in Ecosystem Research (ExpeER) [262060]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The aim of this work was to study the changes during 15 days in the monoterpene emission rates of the Mediterranean shrub rosemary (Rosmarinus officinalis L.), in response to increasing drought stress and fertilisation using two different composts derived from livestock anaerobic digestates (cattle and pig slurry). Drought stress considerably reduced photosynthetic rates, stomatal conductance and isoprenoid emissions and also induced a change in blend composition. In the drought stressed rosemary plants, a positive relationship of non-oxygenated monoterpene emissions and a negative relationship of oxygenated monoterpene with photosynthesis were observed, indicating a different control mechanism over the emissions of the two types of isoprenoids. The emission of non-oxygenated monoterpenes seemed to depend more on photosynthesis and de novo synthesis, whereas emission of oxygenate monoterpenes was more dependent on volatilisation from storage, mainly driven by cumulative temperatures. In the short term, the addition of composted organic materials to the soil did not induce a significant effect on isoprenoid emission rates in the rosemary plants. However, the effect of the interaction between fertilisation and seasonality on isoprenoid emission rates was influenced by the amendment origin. Also, we emphasized changes in potential isoprenoid emission factors throughout the experiment, probably indicating changes in the leaf developmental stage. (C) 2015 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据