4.4 Article

Plasma Protein Binding of Luciferase Substrates Influences Sensitivity and Accuracy of Bioluminescence Imaging

期刊

MOLECULAR IMAGING AND BIOLOGY
卷 13, 期 1, 页码 59-66

出版社

SPRINGER
DOI: 10.1007/s11307-010-0325-x

关键词

Bioluminescence imaging; Protein binding; Small animal imaging; Molecular imaging; Tumor model

资金

  1. Interuniversity Attraction Poles Program-Belgian State-Belgian Science Policy

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Potential confounding factors in bioluminescence imaging (BLI)-quantification need to be identified to improve its accuracy and repeatability. The aim of this study was to study the degree to which plasma protein binding of BLI substrates influences signal intensity and quantification, both in vitro and in vivo. Protein binding was assessed using ultrafiltration and spectrophotometry. Effects of increasing serum protein concentrations were studied in vitro, in intact cells expressing Firefly or Renilla luciferase, and in vivo, in a doxorubicin-induced hypoalbuminemia mouse model. Increasing concentrations of serum proteins showed an important negative effect on BLI signal intensity, both for d-luciferin and coelenterazine-dependent reactions. This was due to a decrease in the free fraction of the substrate in the presence of serum proteins of up to 88%. In vivo, hypoalbuminemia was associated with higher BLI signal intensity, although this was only significant in animals with a major decrease in albumin (< 2 g/dL). Important kinetic differences, including earlier peak luminescence and a more rapid decline in luminescence, were observed for coelenterazine-dependent BLI under hypoalbuminemic conditions. Changes in protein concentrations can significantly influence BLI quantification and its presence decreases sensitivity in vitro. In vivo, effects on signal intensity and kinetics are only noted at severe hypoalbuminemia and can be neglected in most experimental designs. These findings again emphasize the need for careful interpretation of BLI quantification data.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.4
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据