4.4 Article

18F-Labeled Galacto and PEGylated RGD Dimers for PET Imaging of αvβ3 Integrin Expression

期刊

MOLECULAR IMAGING AND BIOLOGY
卷 12, 期 5, 页码 530-538

出版社

SPRINGER
DOI: 10.1007/s11307-009-0284-2

关键词

RGD dimer; Integrin alpha(v)beta(3); Small-animal PET; Polyvalency

资金

  1. National Cancer Institute [R01 120188, R01 CA119053, R21 CA121842, P50 CA114747, U54 CA119367, R24 CA93862]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

In vivo imaging of alpha(v)beta(3) has important diagnostic and therapeutic applications. F-18-Galacto-arginine-glycine-aspartic acid (RGD) has been developed for positron emission tomography (PET) imaging of integrin alpha(v)beta(3) expression and is now being tested on humans. Dimerization and multimerization of cyclic RGD peptides have been reported to improve the integrin alpha(v)beta(3)-binding affinity due to the polyvalency effect. Here, we compared a number of new dimeric RGD peptide tracers with the clinically used F-18-galacto-RGD. RGD monomers and dimers were coupled with galacto or PEG(3) linkers, and labeled with F-18 using 4-nitrophenyl 2-F-18-fluoropropionate (F-18-NFP) or N-succinimidyl 4-F-18-fluorobenzoate as a prosthetic group. The newly developed tracers were evaluated by cell-based receptor-binding assay, biodistribution, and small-animal PET studies in a subcutaneous U87MG glioblastoma xenograft model. Starting with F-18-F-, the total reaction time for F-18-FP-SRGD2 and F-18-FP-PRGD2 is about 120 min. The decay-corrected radiochemical yields for F-18-FP-SRGD2 and F-18-FP-PRGD2 are 52 +/- 9% and 80 +/- 7% calculated from F-18-NFP. Noninvasive small-animal PET and direct tissue sampling experiments demonstrated that the dimeric RGD peptides had significantly higher tumor uptake as compared to F-18-galacto-RGD. Dimeric RGD peptide tracers with relatively high tumor integrin-specific accumulation and favorable in vivo kinetics may have the potential to be translated into clinic for integrin alpha(v)beta(3) imaging.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.4
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据