4.4 Article

Comparison of Optical Bioluminescence Reporter Gene and Superparamagnetic Iron Oxide MR Contrast Agent as Cell Markers for Noninvasive Imaging of Cardiac Cell Transplantation

期刊

MOLECULAR IMAGING AND BIOLOGY
卷 11, 期 3, 页码 178-187

出版社

SPRINGER
DOI: 10.1007/s11307-008-0182-z

关键词

Optical bioluminescence imaging; Magnetic resonance imaging; Reporter gene; Contrast agent; Cell marker; Cell transplantation

资金

  1. NHLBI [5R01HL078632]
  2. NCI ICMIC [P50 CA114747]
  3. NCI SAIRP
  4. American Heart Association Pre-doctoral Fellowship
  5. Stanford Bio-X Graduate Student Fellowship
  6. Swiss Foundation of Medical-Biological
  7. Novartis Research Foundation (JKW)
  8. Swiss Society of Radiology (JKW)
  9. AHA Beginning
  10. NATIONAL CANCER INSTITUTE [P50CA114747] Funding Source: NIH RePORTER
  11. NATIONAL HEART, LUNG, AND BLOOD INSTITUTE [R01HL078632] Funding Source: NIH RePORTER

向作者/读者索取更多资源

In this study, we compared firefly luciferase (Fluc) reporter gene and superparamagnetic iron oxide (Feridex) as cell markers for longitudinal monitoring of cardiomyoblast graft survival using optical bioluminescence imaging (BLI) and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), respectively. Rats (n = 31) underwent an intramyocardial injection of cardiomyoblasts (2 x 10(6)) labeled with Fluc, Feridex, or no marker (control) or an injection of Feridex alone (75 mu g). Afterward, rats were serially imaged with BLI or MRI and killed at different time points for histological analysis. BLI revealed a drastically different cell survival kinetics (half-life = 2.65 days over 6 days) than that revealed by MRI (half-life = 16.8 days over 80 days). Injection of Feridex alone led to prolonged tissue retention of Feridex (a parts per thousand yen16 days) and persistent MR signal (a parts per thousand yen42 days). Fluc BLI reporter gene imaging is a more accurate gauge of transplanted cell survival as compared to MRI of Feridex-labeled cells.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.4
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据