4.4 Article

FDG-PET/CT in the evaluation of cutaneous T-cell lymphoma

期刊

MOLECULAR IMAGING AND BIOLOGY
卷 10, 期 2, 页码 74-81

出版社

SPRINGER
DOI: 10.1007/s11307-007-0127-y

关键词

positron-emission tomography; fluorine-18 fluorodeoxyglucose; cutaneous T-cell lymphoma; mycosis fungoides

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This comprehensive case series illustrates the findings on 2-deoxy-2-[F-18]fluoro-D-glucose (FDG) positron-emission tomography/computed tomography (PET/CT) of patients with varying stages of cutaneous T-cell lymphoma (CTCL). Patients were imaged with full-body scanning using a General Electric Discovery ST 16-slice PET/CT machine. Patients were assessed by PET/CT for cutaneous, nodal, and solid organ FDG uptake, indicative of highly metabolically active (i.e., putatively malignant cells) disease, and comparisons were made to CT data alone and to the physical examination. Several key observations strongly suggested that information afforded by PET/CT scan may be valuable. Various cutaneous lesions, from thin subtle plaques to thick tumors, were revealed and corresponded accurately to the cutaneous examination. In the case of subcutaneous lesions, PET/CT outperformed physical exam. CT also provided the depth/thickness of lesions. The differing levels of FDG uptake in enlarged nodes found within an individual patient as well as among different patients may potentially distinguish reactive from malignant adenopathy. Additionally, lymph nodes that did not meet staging size criteria (e.g., were not >1 cm) revealed increased metabolic activity and, therefore, could be targeted for subsequent monitoring or biopsy. In addition, PET/CT identified visceral involvement in cases with advanced disease. In summary, PET/CT can provide physiologic and anatomic information on the wide diversity of external and internal lesions in CTCL and, therefore, may have great potential for improving the staging and monitoring of response to therapy of cutaneous, nodal, and visceral disease.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.4
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据