4.4 Article

Imaging and Pharmacokinetics of 64Cu-DOTA-HB22.7 Administered by Intravenous, Intraperitoneal, or Subcutaneous Injection to Mice Bearing Non-Hodgkin's Lymphoma Xenografts

期刊

MOLECULAR IMAGING AND BIOLOGY
卷 11, 期 2, 页码 79-87

出版社

SPRINGER
DOI: 10.1007/s11307-008-0148-1

关键词

HB22.7; CD22; Non-Hodgkin's lymphoma; PET; Cu-64

资金

  1. NCI [R24 CA86307]
  2. NIH, NCI [R33 CA89706]
  3. University of California Cancer Research Program
  4. VA Merit grants [1337754, 7855423]
  5. Small Animal Resource Program [R24 CA110804]
  6. Leukemia and Lymphoma Society Translational Research Award
  7. Schwedler Foundation and the deLeuze Endowment for the non-toxic cure of lymphoma
  8. [00-00764V-0133]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Purpose: The aim of the study is to compare the tumor-specific targeting, pharmacokinetics, and biodistribution of Cu-64-DOTA-HB22.7 when administered to xenograft-bearing mice intravenously (IV), intraperitoneally (IP),and subcutaneously (SQ). Procedures: Mice bearing human non-Hodgkin's lymphoma (NHL) xenografts were injected IV, IP, or SQ with Cu-64-DOTA-HB22.7. Xenograft targeting was evaluated by micro positron emission tomography (microPET) and confirmed by organ biodistribution studies. Blood measurements of Cu-64 were performed to determine the pharmacokinetics and clearance of Cu-64-DOTA-HB22.7. Results: Cu-64-DOTA-HB22.7 demonstrated equivalent tumor targeting within 24-48 h, regardless of the route of administration. Organ biodistribution confirmed tumor-specific targeting. Blood pharmacokinetics demonstrated that Cu-64-DOTA-HB22.7 accessed the bloodstream after IP and SQ administration to a similar degree as IV administration, albeit at a slower rate. Conclusions: These findings establish Cu-64-DOTA-HB22.7 as a potential radioimmunotherapeutic and/or NHL-specific imaging agent. These findings provide evidence that IP and SQ administration can achieve results equivalent to IV administration and may lead to more efficient, reproducible treatment plans for antibody-based therapeutics.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.4
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据