4.6 Article

Sperm-specific post-acrosomal WW-domain binding protein (PAWP) does not cause Ca2+ release in mouse oocytes

期刊

MOLECULAR HUMAN REPRODUCTION
卷 20, 期 10, 页码 938-947

出版社

OXFORD UNIV PRESS
DOI: 10.1093/molehr/gau056

关键词

PAWP; PLC zeta; fertilization; oocyte activation; sperm factor

资金

  1. Wellcome Trust [090063/Z/09/Z]
  2. Cardiff University School of Medicine
  3. Wellcome Trust [090063/Z/09/Z] Funding Source: Wellcome Trust

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Mature mammalian oocytes undergo a prolonged series of cytoplasmic calcium (Ca2+) oscillations at fertilization that are the cause of oocyte activation. The Ca2+ oscillations in mammalian oocytes are driven via inositol 1,4,5-trisphosphate (IP3) generation. Microinjection of the sperm-derived phospholipase C-zeta (PLC?), which generates IP3, causes the same pattern of Ca2+ oscillations as observed at mammalian fertilization and it is thought to be the physiological agent that triggers oocyte activation. However, another sperm-specific protein, 'post-acrosomal WW-domain binding protein' (PAWP), has also been reported to elicit activation when injected into mammalian oocytes, and to produce a Ca2+ increase in frog oocytes. Here we have investigated whether PAWP can induce fertilization-like Ca2+ oscillations in mouse oocytes. Recombinant mouse PAWP protein was found to be unable to hydrolyse phosphatidylinositol 4,5-bisphosphate in vitro and did not cause any detectable Ca2+ release when microinjected into mouse oocytes. Microinjection with cRNA encoding either the untagged PAWP, or yellow fluorescent protein (YFP)-PAWP, or luciferase-PAWP fusion proteins all failed to trigger Ca2+ increases in mouse oocytes. The lack of response in mouse oocytes was despite PAWP being robustly expressed at similar or higher concentrations than PLC?, which successfully initiated Ca2+ oscillations in every parallel control experiment. These data suggest that sperm-derived PAWP is not involved in triggering Ca2+ oscillations at fertilization in mammalian oocytes.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据