4.6 Article

MiR-199a attenuates endometrial stromal cell invasiveness through suppression of the IKK/NF-B pathway and reduced interleukin-8 expression

期刊

MOLECULAR HUMAN REPRODUCTION
卷 18, 期 3, 页码 136-145

出版社

OXFORD UNIV PRESS
DOI: 10.1093/molehr/gar066

关键词

endometriosis; miR-199a; invasion; nuclear factor-kappa B; interleukin-8

资金

  1. Leading Academic Discipline Program, 211 Project for Shanghai Jiao Tong University School of Medicine [211-2008-7]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

MicroRNAs have recently been identified as regulators that modulate target gene expression and are suggested to be involved in the development and progression of endometriosis. This study was undertaken to analyze the expression level of microRNA-199a (miR-199a) in paired ovarian endometrioma and eutopic endometrium from women with endometriosis, and to investigate the contribution of miR-199a to the invasive capability of endometrial stromal cells (ESCs). Cell adhesion, migration and Matrigel invasion assays were carried out to measure the invasiveness of ESCs. Bioinformatics prediction, reporter gene assay, PCR, western blotting and ELISA were performed to identify miR-199a targets and related signaling pathways. The results showed that the expression level of miR-199a was lower in the eutopic endometrium from women with endometriosis, and even lower in the paired ovarian endometrioma, compared with the expression in normal controls. Moreover, ectopic expression of miR-199a attenuated ESC adhesion, migration and invasiveness. MiR-199a targeted and inhibited IkappaB kinase beta (IKK) in ESCs. Accompanied by IKK reduction, miR-199a suppressed nuclear factor-kappa B (NF-B) pathway activation and interleukin-8 (IL-8) production in ESCs. All these findings suggest that miR-199a, down-regulated in endometriosis, attenuates the invasive capability of ESCs in vitro partly through IKK/NF-B pathway suppression and reduced IL-8 expression. In conclusion, miR-199a could be involved in the pathogenesis of endometriosis.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据