4.6 Article

Tracking embryo implantation using cell-free fetal DNA enriched from maternal circulation at 9 weeks gestation

期刊

MOLECULAR HUMAN REPRODUCTION
卷 17, 期 7, 页码 434-438

出版社

OXFORD UNIV PRESS
DOI: 10.1093/molehr/gar016

关键词

DNA fingerprinting; microarray; single nucleotide polymorphism; whole genome amplification; fetal DNA

资金

  1. EMD Serono
  2. Schering Plough
  3. Ferring Pharmaceuticals

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Embryo DNA fingerprinting represents an important tool for tracking embryo-specific outcomes after multiple embryo transfer during IVF. The situation in which two embryos are transferred and only one implants represents a unique opportunity for the most well-controlled validation of markers capable of identifying competent and incompetent embryos. Specifically, this design eliminates all patient-related variables from the comparison of embryos with or without reproductive potential. However, in order to determine which embryo implanted, the investigator must wait until newborn DNA is available upon delivery. This study validates a non-invasive cell-free fetal DNA fingerprinting method that reduces the time to identify which embryo implanted by similar to 31 weeks. Thirty-four patients were studied to determine if fingerprinting of fetal DNA extracted from maternal plasma at nine gestational weeks concurred with the buccal DNA results obtained from the newborn after delivery. This validation required single nucleotide polymorphism profiles on each couples' preimplantation embryos, cell-free fetal DNA from maternal plasma at 9 weeks gestation, and newborn DNA obtained from buccal swabs after delivery. The predictions from fetal DNA-based embryo tracking and gender assignments made at 9 weeks gestation were 100% consistent with standardized methods of assessment performed after term delivery. This study demonstrates the first validated fetal DNA fingerprinting method which predicts both gender and which embryo implanted at 9 weeks gestation following multiple embryo transfer.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据