3.9 Article

Antibacterial effects of silver ions on growth of gram-negative bacteria and biofilm formation

期刊

出版社

ALLERTON PRESS INC
DOI: 10.3103/S0891416809040065

关键词

silver ions; antibacterial effect; biofilm formation; regulatory genes

资金

  1. Russian Academy of Sciences [27]
  2. Russian Foundation for Basic Research [09-04-00422]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The average minimal inhibiting concentrations (MICs) of AgNO3 for the gram-negative bacteria Escherichia coli K12, Serratia proteamaculans 94, and Serratia liquefaciens MG1 were found to be 0.075-0.3 mu g/ml and, for Pseudomonas aeruginosa PAO1 and P. chlororaphis 449, this concentration was 0.15-0.3 mu g/ml. The formation of a biofilm by Escherichia coli AB1157 and S. proteamaculans 94 was completely inhibited by 0.3 mu g/ml of AgNO3 and, in the case of Pseudomonas aeruginosa PAO1, biofilm formation was inhibited by 0.6 mu g/ml of AgNO3. Mutations in E. coli genes that encode global regulators of gene expression, such as sigma S and sigma N subunits of RNA polymerase, the catabolite repression protein CRP, and the Lon protease, had no marked effect on the sensitivity of cells to silver. Wild-type E. coli strains and strains deficient in excision repair (uvrA and uvrB), SOS repair, and recombination (recA, lexA, recBC, and recF mutants) did not differ in their sensitivity to silver. This suggests that the sensitivity of the bacteria to the silver was not associated with DNA lesions that could be repaired by these repair and recombination systems. E. coli mutant strains deficient in OmpF or OmpC porins were three to four times more resistant to silver ions than the wild-type strain. Experiments with the pME6863 plasmid, which bears the gene of N-acyl-homoserine lactonase AiiA, demonstrated that the quorum sensing (QS) regulation did not participate in controlling the sensitivity of S. proteamaculans 94 and P. chlororaphis 449 to silver. The same conclusion was drawn from a comparison of AgNO3 MICs of the S. liquefaciens wild-type strain and a mutant strain deficient in QS.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

3.9
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据