4.4 Article

Long-term safety of dichloroacetate in congenital lactic acidosis

期刊

MOLECULAR GENETICS AND METABOLISM
卷 109, 期 2, 页码 139-143

出版社

ACADEMIC PRESS INC ELSEVIER SCIENCE
DOI: 10.1016/j.ymgme.2013.03.019

关键词

Congenital lactic acidosis; Dichloroacetate; Pyruvate dehydrogenase; Respiratory chain; Clinical trial

资金

  1. University of Florida Clinical and Translational Science Institute
  2. NIH/NCATS Clinical and Translational Science Award [UL1 TR000064]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

We followed 8 patients (4 males) with biochemically and/or molecular genetically proven deficiencies of the El et subunit of the pyruvate dehydrogenase complex (PDC; 3 patients) or respiratory chain complexes I (I patient), IV (3 patients) or I + IV (1 patient) who received oral dichloroacetate (DCA; 12.5 mg/kg/12 h) for 9.7 to 16.5 years. All subjects originally participated in randomized controlled trials of DCA and were continued on an open-label chronic safety study. Patients (1 adult) ranged in age from 3.5 to 40.2 years at the start of DCA administration and are currently aged 16.9 to 49.9 years (mean +/- SD: 23.5 +/- 10.9 years). Subjects were either normal or below normal body weight for age and gender. The 3 PDC deficient patients did not consume high fat (ketogenic) diets. DCA maintained normal blood lactate concentrations, even in PDC deficient children on essentially unrestricted diets. Hematological, electrolyte, renal and hepatic status remained stable. Nerve conduction either did not change or decreased modestly and led to reduction or temporary discontinuation of DCA in 3 patients, although symptomatic worsening of peripheral neuropathy did not occur. We conclude that chronic DCA administration is generally well-tolerated in patients with congenital causes of lactic acidosis and is effective in maintaining normal blood lactate levels, even in PDC-deficient children not consuming strict ketogenic diets. (C) 2013 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.4
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据