4.4 Article

Urinary phenylacetylglutamine as dosing biomarker for patients with urea cycle disorders

期刊

MOLECULAR GENETICS AND METABOLISM
卷 107, 期 3, 页码 308-314

出版社

ACADEMIC PRESS INC ELSEVIER SCIENCE
DOI: 10.1016/j.ymgme.2012.08.006

关键词

Urea cycle disorders; Phenylacetic acid; Glycerol phenylbutyrate; Sodium phenylbutyrate; Phenylacetylglutamine; Phenylbutyric acid

资金

  1. Hyperion Therapeutics
  2. Clinical and Translational Science Awards/General Clinical Research Center Grants (Baylor College of Medicine) [M01RR00188]
  3. Case Western Reserve University [UL1RR024989]
  4. Clinical and Translational Science Institute at Children's National Medical Center NIH/NCRR [UL1RR31988]
  5. Medical College of Wisconsin [UL1RR31973]
  6. Mount Sinai School of Medicine [UL1RR29887]
  7. Oregon Health & Science University [UL1RR24140]
  8. Stanford University [UL1RR25744]
  9. Tufts University [UL1RR25752]
  10. University of California, Los Angeles [UL1RR33176]
  11. University of Colorado [UL1RR25780]
  12. University of Florida [UL1RR29890]
  13. University of Minnesota [UL1RR33183]
  14. University of Pittsburgh [UL1RR24153, UL1TR000005]
  15. University of Utah [UL1RR25764]
  16. University of Washington [UL1RR25014]
  17. Urea Cycle Disorders Consortium (NIH) [U54RR019453]
  18. O'Malley Foundation
  19. Kettering Fund
  20. National Urea Cycle Disorders Foundation Research Fellowship

向作者/读者索取更多资源

We have analyzed pharmacokinetic data for glycerol phenylbutyrate (also GT4P or HPN-100) and sodium phenylbutyrate with respect to possible dosing biomarkers in patients with urea cycle disorders (UCD). Study design: These analyses are based on over 3000 urine and plasma data points from 54 adult and 11 pediatric UCD patients (ages 6-17) who participated in three clinical studies comparing ammonia control and pharmacokinetics during steady state treatment with glycerol phenylbutyrate or sodium phenylbutyrate. All patients received phenylbutyric acid equivalent doses of glycerol phenylbutyrate or sodium phenylbutyrate in a cross over fashion and underwent 24-hour blood samples and urine sampling for phenylbutyric acid, phenylacetic acid and phenylacetylglutamine. Results: Patients received phenylbutyric acid equivalent doses of glycerol phenylbutyrate ranging from 15 to 31.8 g/day and of sodium phenylbutyrate ranging from 13 to 31.7 g/day. Plasma metabolite levels varied widely, with average fluctuation indices ranging from 1979% to 5690% for phenylbutyric acid, 843% to 3931% for phenylacetic acid, and 881% to 1434% for phenylacetylglutamine. Mean percent recovery of phenylbutyric acid as urinary phenylacetylglutamine was 66.4 and 69.0 for pediatric patients and 68.7 and 71.4 for adult patients on glycerol phenylbutyrate and sodium phenylbutyrate, respectively. The correlation with dose was strongest for urinary phenylacetylglutamine excretion, either as morning spot urine (r=0.730, p<0.001) or as total 24-hour excretion (r=0.791 p<0.001), followed by plasma phenylacetylglutamine AUC(24-hour), plasma phenylacetic acid AUC(24-hour) and phenylbutyric add AUC(24-hour). Plasma phenylacetic acid levels in adult and pediatric patients did not show a consistent relationship with either urinary phenylacetylglutamine or ammonia control. Conclusion: The findings are collectively consistent with substantial yet variable pre-systemic (1st pass) conversion of phenylbutyric acid to phenylacetic acid and/or phenylacetylglutamine. The variability of blood metabolite levels during the day, their weaker correlation with dose, the need for multiple blood samples to capture trough and peak, and the inconsistency between phenylacetic acid and urinary phenylacetylglutamine as a marker of waste nitrogen scavenging limit the utility of plasma levels for therapeutic monitoring. By contrast, 24-hour urinary phenylacetylglutamine and morning spot urine phenylacetylglutamine correlate strongly with dose and appear to be clinically useful non-invasive biomarkers for compliance and therapeutic monitoring. (C) 2012 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.4
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据