4.4 Article

Globotriaosylceramide induces oxidative stress and up-regulates cell adhesion molecule expression in Fabry disease endothelial cells

期刊

MOLECULAR GENETICS AND METABOLISM
卷 95, 期 3, 页码 163-168

出版社

ACADEMIC PRESS INC ELSEVIER SCIENCE
DOI: 10.1016/j.ymgme.2008.06.016

关键词

Fabry disease; alpha-Galactosidase A deficiency; Globotriaosylceramide; Endothelial cells; Reactive oxygen species; Cell adhesion molecule

资金

  1. National Institute of Neurological Disorders and Stroke
  2. NIH

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Fabry disease, an X-linked systemic vasculopathy, is caused by a deficiency of alpha-galactosidase A resulting in globotriaosylceramide (Gb(3)) storage in cells. The pathogenic role of Gb(3) in the disease is not known. Based on previous work, we tested the hypothesis that accumulation of Gb(3) in the vascular endothelium of Fabry disease is associated with increased production of reactive oxygen species (ROS) and increased expression of cell adhesion molecules. Gb(3)-loading resulted in increased intracellular ROS production in cultured vascular endothelial cells in a dose-dependent manner. Increased Gb(3) also induced expression of intercellular adhesion molecule-1, vascular cell adhesion molecule-1, and E-selectin. Reduction of endogenous Gb(3) by treatment of the cells with an inhibitor of glycosphingolipid synthase or alpha-galactosidase A led to decreased expression of adhesion molecules. Plasma from Fabry patients significantly increased ROS generation in endothelial cells when compared with plasma from non-Fabry controls. This effect was not influenced by reduction of intracellular Gb(3). This study provided direct evidence that excess intracellular Gb(3) induces oxidative stress and up-regulates the expression of cellular adhesion molecules in vascular endothelial cells. In addition. other factors in patient's plasma may also contribute to oxidative stress in Fabry vascular endothelial cells. (C) 2008 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.4
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据