4.7 Article

Frequencies of heavy metal resistance are associated with land cover type in the Upper Mississippi River

期刊

SCIENCE OF THE TOTAL ENVIRONMENT
卷 511, 期 -, 页码 461-468

出版社

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2014.12.069

关键词

Amplicon sequencing; Bacterial community structure; Fosmid library; Functional analyses; Heavy metal resistance; Mississippi River

资金

  1. Minnesota Environment and Natural Resources Trust Fund [M.L. 2011, 05C]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Taxonomic compositions of freshwater bacterial communities have been well-characterized via metagenomic and amplicon-based approaches, especially next-generation sequencing. However, functional diversity of these communities remains less well-studied. Various anthropogenic sources are known to impact the bacterial community composition in freshwater riverine systems and potentially alter functional diversity. In this study, high-throughput functional screening of large (similar to 10,000 clones) fosmid libraries representing communities in the Upper Mississippi River revealed low frequencies of resistance to heavy metals in the following order: Mn2+ > Cr3+ >Zn2+ > Cd2+ > Hg2+. No resistance to Cu2+ was detected. Significant, but weak, correlations were observed between resistance frequencies of Cd and Cr with developed land cover (r(2) = 0.08,P = 0.016 and r = 0.07,P = 0.037, respectively). While discriminant function analyses further supported these associations, redundancy analysis further indicated associations with forested land cover and greater resistance to Hg and Zn. Nutrient and metal ion concentrations and abundances of bacterial orders were poorly correlated with heavy metal resistance, except for an association of Pseudomonadales abundance and resistance to Hg and Zn. Taken together, results of this study suggest that allochthonous bacteria contributed from specific land cover types influence the patterns of metal resistance throughout this river. (C) 2014 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据