4.7 Article

Receptor modelling study of polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons in Jeddah, Saudi Arabia

期刊

SCIENCE OF THE TOTAL ENVIRONMENT
卷 506, 期 -, 页码 401-408

出版社

ELSEVIER SCIENCE BV
DOI: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2014.10.056

关键词

Polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons; PAH; Positive matrix factorisation; PMF; Source apportionment

资金

  1. King Abdulaziz University (KAU) [3-10-1432/HiCi]
  2. KAU
  3. NERC [NE/F016581/1] Funding Source: UKRI
  4. Natural Environment Research Council [NE/F016581/1] Funding Source: researchfish

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Measurements of 14 polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons (PAH) have been made in Jeddah, Saudi Arabia, with a view to establishing the concentrations in this major city, and quantifying the contributions of major sources. Particulate and vapour forms have been sampled and analysed separately. The concentrations are compared to measurements from other sites in the Middle Eastern region and are towards the lower end of the range, being far lower than concentrations reported from Riyadh (Saudi Arabia), Assiut (Egypt) and Tehran (Iran) but broadly similar to those measured in Damascus (Syria) and higher than those measured in Kuwait. The partitioning between vapour and particle phases is similar to that in data from Egypt and China, but with many compounds showing a higher particle-associated percentage than in Birmingham (UK) possibly reflecting a higher concentration of airborne particulate matter in the former countries. Concentrations in Jeddah were significantly higher at a site close to the oil refinery and a site close to a major ring road than at a suburban site to the north of the city. Application of positive matrix factorisation to the pooled data elicited three factors accounting respectively for 17%, 33% and 50% of the measured sum of PAH and these are interpreted as arising from gasoline vehicles, industrial sources, particularly the oil refinery, and to diesel/fuel oil combustion. (C) 2014 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据