3.9 Article

Dysregulation of adipose glutathione peroxidase 3 in obesity contributes to local and systemic oxidative stress

期刊

MOLECULAR ENDOCRINOLOGY
卷 22, 期 9, 页码 2176-2189

出版社

OXFORD UNIV PRESS INC
DOI: 10.1210/me.2008-0023

关键词

-

资金

  1. Korea Science and Engineering Foundation
  2. Korean government (Ministry of Eductaion, Sci and Technol, MEST) [R0A-2004-000-10359-0, R11-2005-00901002-0, M10748000258-07N4800-25810]
  3. BK21
  4. National Research Foundation of Korea [과06A1204, R11-2005-009-06002-0, R0A-2004-000-10359-0] Funding Source: Korea Institute of Science & Technology Information (KISTI), National Science & Technology Information Service (NTIS)

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Glutathione peroxidase 3 (GPx3) accounts for the major antioxidant activity in the plasma. Here, we demonstrate that down-regulation of GPx3 in the plasma of obese subjects is associated with adipose GPx3 dysregulation, resulting from the increase of inflammatory signals and oxidative stress. Although GPx3 was abundantly expressed in kidney, lung, and adipose tissue, we observed that GPx3 expression was reduced selectively in the adipose tissue of several obese animal models as decreasing plasma GPx3 level. Adipose GPx3 expression was greatly suppressed by prooxidative conditions such as high levels of TNF alpha and hypoxia. In contrast, the antioxidant N-acetyl cysteine and the antidiabetic drug rosiglitazone increased adipose GPx3 expression in obese and diabetic db/db mice. Moreover, GPx3 overexpression in adipocytes improved high glucose-induced insulin resistance and attenuated inflammatory gene expression whereas GPx3 neutralization in adipocytes promoted expression of proinflammatory genes. Taken together, these data suggest that suppression of GPx3 expression in the adipose tissue of obese subjects might constitute a vicious cycle to expand local reactive oxygen species accumulation in adipose tissue potentially into systemic oxidative stress and obesity-related metabolic complications.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

3.9
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据