4.7 Article

Mixing of vineyard and oak-tree ecotypes of Saccharomyces cerevisiae in North American vineyards

期刊

MOLECULAR ECOLOGY
卷 22, 期 11, 页码 2917-2930

出版社

WILEY
DOI: 10.1111/mec.12155

关键词

gene flow; oak; population genetics; Saccharomyces cerevisiae; vineyard; yeast

资金

  1. NIH [GM080669]
  2. Washington University Genomic Technology Access Center
  3. Center for Genome Sciences

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Humans have had a significant impact on the distribution and abundance of Saccharomyces cerevisiae through its widespread use in beer, bread and wine production. Yet, similar to other Saccharomyces species, S.cerevisiae has also been isolated from habitats unrelated to fermentations. Strains of S.cerevisiae isolated from grapes, wine must and vineyards worldwide are genetically differentiated from strains isolated from oak-tree bark, exudate and associated soil in North America. However, the causes and consequences of this differentiation have not yet been resolved. Historical differentiation of these two groups may have been influenced by geographic, ecological or human-associated barriers to gene flow. Here, we make use of the relatively recent establishment of vineyards across North America to identify and characterize any active barriers to gene flow between these two groups. We examined S.cerevisiae strains isolated from grapes and oak trees within three North American vineyards and compared them to those isolated from oak trees outside of vineyards. Within vineyards, we found evidence of migration between grapes and oak trees and potential gene flow between the divergent oak-tree and vineyard groups. Yet, we found no vineyard genotypes on oak trees outside of vineyards. In contrast, Saccharomyces paradoxus isolated from the same sources showed population structure characterized by isolation by distance. The apparent absence of ecological or genetic barriers between sympatric vineyard and oak-tree populations of S.cerevisiae implies that vineyards play an important role in the mixing between these two groups.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据