4.7 Article

Genome divergence during evolutionary diversification as revealed in replicate lake-stream stickleback population pairs

期刊

MOLECULAR ECOLOGY
卷 21, 期 12, 页码 2852-2862

出版社

WILEY
DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-294X.2012.05509.x

关键词

FST outlier; Gasterosteus aculeatus; gene flow; next generation sequencing; population genomics; RAD; speciation

资金

  1. Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council (NSERC) of Canada
  2. European Research Council (ERC)
  3. Swiss National Science Foundation [PBBSA-111216, Ambizione PZ00P3_126391/1]
  4. University of Basel

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Evolutionary diversification is often initiated by adaptive divergence between populations occupying ecologically distinct environments while still exchanging genes. The genetic foundations of this divergence process are largely unknown and are here explored through genome scans in multiple independent lakestream population pairs of threespine stickleback. We find that across the pairs, overall genomic divergence is associated with the magnitude of divergence in phenotypes known to be under divergent selection. Along this same axis of increasing diversification, genomic divergence becomes increasingly biased towards the centre of chromosomes as opposed to the peripheries. We explain this pattern by within-chromosome variation in the physical extent of hitchhiking, as recombination is greatly reduced in chromosome centres. Correcting for this effect suggests that a great number of genes distributed widely across the genome are involved in the divergence into lake vs. stream habitats. Analyzing additional allopatric population pairs, however, reveals that strong divergence in some genomic regions has been driven by selection unrelated to lakestream ecology. Our study highlights a major contribution of large-scale variation in recombination rate to generating heterogeneous genomic divergence and indicates that elucidating the genetic basis of adaptive divergence might be more challenging than currently recognized.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据