4.7 Review

No gene flow across the Eastern Pacific Barrier in the reef-building coral Porites lobata

期刊

MOLECULAR ECOLOGY
卷 21, 期 22, 页码 5418-5433

出版社

WILEY
DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-294X.2012.05733.x

关键词

central Pacific; Clipperton Atoll; Eastern Tropical Pacific; gene flow; microsatellite; Porites lobata

资金

  1. NSF [OCE-0550294]
  2. Division Of Ocean Sciences
  3. Directorate For Geosciences [0928764] Funding Source: National Science Foundation

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The expanse of deep water between the central Pacific islands and the continental shelf of the Eastern Tropical Pacific is regarded as the world's most potent marine biogeographic barrier. During recurrent climatic fluctuations (ENSO, El Nino Southern Oscillation), however, changes in water temperature and the speed and direction of currents become favourable for trans-oceanic dispersal of larvae from central Pacific to marginal eastern Pacific reefs. Here, we investigate the population connectivity of the reef-building coral Porites lobata across the Eastern Pacific Barrier (EPB). Patterns of recent gene flow in samples (n=1173) from the central Pacific and the Eastern Tropical Pacific (ETP) were analysed with 12 microsatellite loci. Results indicated that P.lobata from the ETP are strongly isolated from those in the central Pacific and Hawaii (Fct ' =0.509; P<0.001). However, samples from Clipperton Atoll, an oceanic island on the eastern side of the EPB, grouped with the central Pacific. Within the central Pacific, Hawaiian populations were strongly isolated from three co-occurring clusters found throughout the remainder of the central Pacific. No further substructure was evident in the ETP. Changes in oceanographic conditions during ENSO over the past several thousand years thus appear insufficient to support larval deliveries from the central Pacific to the ETP or strong postsettlement selection acts on ETP settlers from the central Pacific. Recovery of P.lobata populations in the frequently disturbed ETP thus must depend on local larval sources.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据