4.7 Article

The behavior and toxicological effects of decabromodiphenyl ether (BDE209) in a soil-earthworm system

期刊

SCIENCE OF THE TOTAL ENVIRONMENT
卷 537, 期 -, 页码 377-384

出版社

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2015.08.022

关键词

BDE209; Earthworm; Kinetic rate constant; Lysosomal stability; Soil-earthworm system

资金

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [41371467]
  2. Shanghai Pujiang Program [15PJD013]
  3. Major State Basic Research Development Program of China [2011CB200904]
  4. National Environmental Protection Public Welfare Science and Technology Research Program of China [201309047, 201309030]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Decabromodiphenyl ether (BDE209) is easily absorbed by soil particles but barely degraded over time. Its potential ecological risk has received extensive attention. Here we supplemented natural soil with three different levels of BDE209 (1, 10 and 100 mg kg(-1) dry weight (i.e., dw)) to focus on the behavior and toxicological effects of BDE209 in a soil-earthworm system. Results demonstrated that earthworms accumulated BDE209 quickly, followed by biphasic elimination. The uptake rate constant (k(u)) values ranged from 0.156 to 0.232 mg(soil) kg(worm)(-1) d(-1), while the depuration rate (k(d)) values ranged from 0.228 to 0.239 d(-1). Biota-soil accumulation factor (BSAF) was also calculated in the present study, and the BSAF values for BDE209 ranged from 0.074 to 0.123. Throughout 28-d exposure, the concentrations of BDE209 among soil, worm casts and earthworms reached steady-state equilibrium. BDE209 content in worm casts might be a good indicator of actual concentration in soil. Neutral red retention time (NRRT) was also conducted to assess the lysosomal membrane stability, and it declined during the uptake phase when BDE209 gradually accumulated in earthworms, indicating a good dose-response relationship. These observations provide new insights into the potential ecological effects of BDE209 in a model soil-earthworm system. (C) 2015 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据