4.7 Article

Geographic variation in the structure of oak hybrid zones provides insights into the dynamics of speciation

期刊

MOLECULAR ECOLOGY
卷 20, 期 23, 页码 4995-5011

出版社

WILEY
DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-294X.2011.05354.x

关键词

hybrid zone; introgression; molecular marker; population history; reinforcement; speciation

资金

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [31121003]
  2. Fundamental Research Funds for the Central Universities of China [2009SC-4]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Studying geographic variation in the rate of hybridization between closely related species could provide a useful window on the evolution of reproductive isolation. Reinforcement theory predicts greater prezygotic isolation in areas of prolonged contact between recently diverged species than in areas of recent contact, which implies that old contact zones would be dominated by parental phenotypes with few hybrids (bimodal hybrid zones), whereas recent contact zones would be characterized by hybrid swarms (unimodal hybrid zones). Here, we investigate how the hybrid zones of two closely related Chinese oaks, Quercus mongolica and Q.similar to liaotungensis, are structured geographically using both nuclear and chloroplast markers. We found that populations of Q.similar to liaotungensis located around the Changbai Mountains in Northeast China, an inferred glacial refugium, were introgressed by genes from Q.similar to mongolica, suggesting historical contact between the two species in this region. However, these introgressed populations form sharp bimodal hybrid zones with Q.similar to mongolica. In contrast, populations of Q.similar to liaotungensis located in North China, which show no sign of ancient introgression with Q.similar to mongolica, form unimodal hybrid zones with Q.similar to mongolica. These results are consistent with the hypothesis that selection against hybrids has had sufficient time to reinforce the reproductive barriers between Q.similar to liaotungensis and Q.similar to mongolica in Northeast China but not in North China.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据