4.7 Article

Effects of climate change and agricultural adaptation on nutrient loading from Finnish catchments to the Baltic Sea

期刊

SCIENCE OF THE TOTAL ENVIRONMENT
卷 529, 期 -, 页码 168-181

出版社

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2015.05.055

关键词

Climate change; Nutrient loading; Baltic Sea; Agricultural scenarios; Water quality modeling; VEMALA

资金

  1. Academy of Finland [140871, 140840, 140833]
  2. Academy of Finland (AKA) [140871, 140840, 140833, 140871, 140840, 140833] Funding Source: Academy of Finland (AKA)

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Climate change is expected to increase annual and especially winter runoff, shorten the snow cover period and therefore increase both nutrient leaching from agricultural areas and natural background leaching in the Baltic Sea catchment. We estimated the effects of climate change and possible future scenarios of agricultural changes on the phosphorus and nitrogen loading to the Baltic Sea from Finnish catchments. In the agricultural scenarios we assumed that the prices of agricultural products are among the primary drivers in the adaptation to climate change, as they affect the level of fertilization and the production intensity and volume and, hence, the modeled changes in gross nutrient loading from agricultural land. Optimal adaptation may increase production while supporting appropriate use of fertilization, resulting in low nutrient balance in the fields. However, a less optimal adaptation may result in higher nutrient balance and increased leaching. The changes in nutrient loading to the Baltic Sea were predicted by taking into account the agricultural scenarios in a nutrient loading model for Finnish catchments (VEMALA), which simulates runoff, nutrient processes, leaching and transport on land, in rivers and in lakes. We thus integrated the effects of climate change in the agricultural sector, nutrient loading in fields, natural background loading, hydrology and nutrient transport and retention processes. (C) 2015 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据