4.7 Article

DOG1 expression is predicted by the seed-maturation environment and contributes to geographical variation in germination in Arabidopsis thaliana

期刊

MOLECULAR ECOLOGY
卷 20, 期 16, 页码 3336-3349

出版社

WILEY-BLACKWELL
DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-294X.2011.05181.x

关键词

abscisic acid; dormancy; germination; natural variation; trans-generational plasticity

资金

  1. Max Planck Society
  2. Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft within the Collaborative Research Center [SFB680, SFB 572]
  3. National Science Foundation (NSF) [DEB 0807973, ISO 0544053]
  4. Division Of Integrative Organismal Systems
  5. Direct For Biological Sciences [844280] Funding Source: National Science Foundation

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Seasonal germination timing of Arabidopsis thaliana strongly influences overall life history expression and is the target of intense natural selection. This seasonal germination timing depends strongly on the interaction between genetics and seasonal environments both before and after seed dispersal. DELAY OF GERMINATION 1 (DOG1) is the first gene that has been identified to be associated with natural variation in primary dormancy in A. thaliana. Here, we report interaccession variation in DOG1 expression and document that DOG1 expression is associated with seed-maturation temperature effects on germination; DOG1 expression increased when seeds were matured at low temperature, and this increased expression was associated with increased dormancy of those seeds. Variation in DOG1 expression suggests a geographical structure such that southern accessions, which are more dormant, tend to initiate DOG1 expression earlier during seed maturation and achieved higher expression levels at the end of silique development than did northern accessions. Although elimination of the synthesis of phytohormone abscisic acid (ABA) results in the elimination of maternal temperature effects on dormancy, DOG1 expression predicted dormancy better than expression of genes involved in ABA metabolism.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据