4.7 Article

Genetic diversity of wild grapevine populations in Spain and their genetic relationships with cultivated grapevines

期刊

MOLECULAR ECOLOGY
卷 21, 期 4, 页码 800-816

出版社

WILEY
DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-294X.2011.05395.x

关键词

genetic diversity; genetic relationships; Spain; Vitis vinifera ssp; sylvestris; Vitis vinifera ssp; vinifera

资金

  1. Ministry of Education and Science [MEC CGL-2005-06821-C02-01, GEN2003-20232-C02]
  2. INIA [RTA2008-00032-C02-01, RF02-010-C3-1, RF2004-00038, RF2006-00010]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The wild grapevine, Vitis vinifera L. ssp. sylvestris (Gmelin) Hegi, considered as the ancestor of the cultivated grapevine, is native from Eurasia. In Spain, natural populations of V. vinifera ssp. sylvestris can still be found along river banks. In this work, we have performed a wide search of wild grapevine populations in Spain and characterized the amount and distribution of their genetic diversity using 25 nuclear SSR loci. We have also analysed the possible coexistence in the natural habitat of wild grapevines with naturalized grapevine cultivars and rootstocks. In this way, phenotypic and genetic analyses identified 19% of the collected samples as derived from cultivated genotypes, being either naturalized cultivars or hybrid genotypes derived from spontaneous crosses between wild and cultivated grapevines. The genetic diversity of wild grapevine populations was similar than that observed in the cultivated group. The molecular analysis showed that cultivated germplasm and wild germplasm are genetically divergent with low level of introgression. Using a model-based approach implemented in the software structure, we identified four genetic groups, with two of them fundamentally represented among cultivated genotypes and two among wild accessions. The analyses of genetic relationships between wild and cultivated grapevines could suggest a genetic contribution of wild accessions from Spain to current Western cultivars.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据