期刊
MOLECULAR ECOLOGY
卷 17, 期 22, 页码 4782-4785出版社
WILEY-BLACKWELL
DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-294X.2008.03958.x
关键词
F(ST); local adaptation; population differentiation; P(ST); Q(ST); wild populations
资金
- Natural Environment Research Council [NE/D008883/1, NE/C511313/1] Funding Source: researchfish
- NERC [NE/D008883/1] Funding Source: UKRI
Comparisons between putatively neutral genetic differentiation amongst populations, F(ST), and quantitative genetic variation, Q(ST), are increasingly being used to test for natural selection. However, we find that approximately half of the comparisons that use only data from wild populations confound phenotypic and genetic variation. We urge the use of a clear distinction between narrow-sense Q(ST), which can be meaningfully compared with F(ST), and phenotypic divergence measured between populations, P(ST), which is inadequate for comparisons in the wild. We also point out that an unbiased estimate of Q(ST) can be found using the so-called 'animal model' of quantitative genetics.
作者
我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。
推荐
暂无数据