4.8 Article

A High-Throughput Chromatin Immunoprecipitation Approach Reveals Principles of Dynamic Gene Regulation in Mammals

期刊

MOLECULAR CELL
卷 47, 期 5, 页码 810-822

出版社

CELL PRESS
DOI: 10.1016/j.molcel.2012.07.030

关键词

-

资金

  1. Human Frontiers Science Program
  2. Career Development Award
  3. ISF
  4. Bikura Institutional Research Grant Program
  5. ERC [309788]
  6. Broad Institute
  7. DARPA [D12AP00004]
  8. HHMI, NHGRI [1P01HG005062-01]
  9. NIH PIONEER award [DP1-OD003958-01]
  10. Burroughs-Wellcome Fund Career Award at the Scientific Interface
  11. Center for Excellence in Genome Science from the NHGRI [1P50HG006193]
  12. EU
  13. US-Israel Binational Science Foundation
  14. New England Regional Center for Excellence/Biodefense and Emerging Infectious Disease [U54 AI057159]
  15. European Research Council (ERC) [309788] Funding Source: European Research Council (ERC)

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Understanding the principles governing mammalian gene regulation has been hampered by the difficulty in measuring in vivo binding dynamics of large numbers of transcription factors (TF) to DNA. Here, we develop a high-throughput Chromatin Immuno-Precipitation (HT-ChIP) method to systematically map protein-DNA interactions. HT-ChIP was applied to define the dynamics of DNA binding by 25 TFs and 4 chromatin marks at 4 time-points following pathogen stimulus of dendritic cells. Analyzing over 180,000 TF-DNA interactions we find that TFs vary substantially in their temporal binding landscapes. This data suggests a model for transcription regulation whereby TF networks are hierarchically organized into cell differentiation factors, factors that bind targets prior to stimulus to prime them for induction, and factors that regulate specific gene programs. Overlaying HT-ChIP data on gene-expression dynamics shows that many TF-DNA interactions are established prior to the stimuli, predominantly at immediate-early genes, and identified specific TF ensembles that coordinately regulate gene-induction.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据