4.8 Article

Tissue-Specific Splicing of Disordered Segments that Embed Binding Motifs Rewires Protein Interaction Networks

期刊

MOLECULAR CELL
卷 46, 期 6, 页码 871-883

出版社

CELL PRESS
DOI: 10.1016/j.molcel.2012.05.039

关键词

-

资金

  1. Medical Research Council [MC-A025-5PK11-6801-0000-0000]
  2. Wellcome Trust
  3. HFSP [RGY0073/2010]
  4. EMBO Young Investigator Program
  5. Gates Cambridge Scholarship
  6. Knox Trinity Studentship
  7. John Templeton Foundation [12793]
  8. Association of International Cancer Research [10-0193]
  9. EMBO [EMBO-STF 312-2011]
  10. ERASysBio+ (GRAPPLE)
  11. Medical Research Council [1359160, MC_U105185859, MC_U105178934] Funding Source: researchfish
  12. MRC [MC_U105178934, MC_U105185859] Funding Source: UKRI

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Alternative inclusion of exons increases the functional diversity of proteins. Among alternatively spliced exons, tissue-specific exons play a critical role in maintaining tissue identity. This raises the question of how tissue-specific protein-coding exons influence protein function. Here we investigate the structural, functional, interaction, and evolutionary properties of constitutive, tissue-specific, and other alternative exons in human. We find that tissue-specific protein segments often contain disordered regions, are enriched in posttranslational modification sites, and frequently embed conserved binding motifs. Furthermore, genes containing tissue-specific exons tend to occupy central positions in interaction networks and display distinct interaction partners in the respective tissues, and are enriched in signaling, development, and disease genes. Based on these findings, we propose that tissue-specific inclusion of disordered segments that contain binding motifs rewires interaction networks and signaling pathways. In this way, tissue-specific splicing may contribute to functional versatility of proteins and increases the diversity of interaction networks across tissues.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据