4.6 Article

Bioactive tanshinone I inhibits the growth of lung cancer in part via downregulation of Aurora A function

期刊

MOLECULAR CARCINOGENESIS
卷 52, 期 7, 页码 535-543

出版社

WILEY
DOI: 10.1002/mc.21888

关键词

lung cancer; tanshinones; apoptosis; angiogenesis; proliferation; Aurora A

资金

  1. Department of Defense [PC073988]
  2. National Institutes of Health [CA133865]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Lung cancer is the leading cause of cancer death in the world, and the searching for novel efficacious and safe agents for lung cancer prevention remains the top priority of lung cancer research. In the present study, we evaluated the effect of bioactive tanshinones from a Chinese herb Salvia miltiorrhiza, cryptotanshinone (CT), tanshinone I (T1) and tanshinone IIA (T2A), on the proliferation inhibition of lung cancer cell lines. Tanshinones inhibited the lung cancer cell proliferation in vitro, with T1 the most potent, via cell cycle arrest and apoptosis induction. Gene function assay showed that Aurora A knockdown by siRNA dramatically eliminated the T1 activity in vitro, suggesting that Aurora A is an important functional target for T1. We further evaluated the effectiveness of T1 on the growth of H1299 nonsmall lung cancer cell in a mouse model. Tanshinone I inhibited the growth of H1299 lung tumor in a dose-dependent manner. Tanshinone I at 200mg/kg body weight significantly reduced final tumor weight by 34% (P<0.05) associated with inhibiting proliferation and inducing apoptosis of lung cancer cells by 54% (P<0.001) and 193% (P<0.001), respectively, inhibiting lung tumor angiogenesis by 72% (P<0.001), and reducing Aurora A expression by 67% (P<0.001). On the other hand, T1 did not significantly alter food intake or body weight. Our results provided experimental evidence to suggest that T1 may be an efficacious and safe agent for the prevention of lung cancer progression and Aurora A may be an important molecular target for T1 action against lung cancer. (c) 2012 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据