4.6 Review

Strategies to Address Chimeric Antigen Receptor Tonic Signaling

期刊

MOLECULAR CANCER THERAPEUTICS
卷 17, 期 9, 页码 1795-1815

出版社

AMER ASSOC CANCER RESEARCH
DOI: 10.1158/1535-7163.MCT-17-1097

关键词

-

类别

资金

  1. Medical Research Council [MR/R001936/1, MR/M024733/1]
  2. Wellcome Trust [104802/Z/14/Z]
  3. Cancer Research UK [C11499/A21623]
  4. British Lung Foundation [MPG16-6]
  5. Pancreatic Cancer UK
  6. Experimental Cancer Medicine Centre at King's College London
  7. King's Health Partners Cancer Research UK Cancer Centre
  8. National Institute for Health Research (NIHR) Biomedical Research Centre
  9. MRC [MR/M024733/1, MR/R001936/1] Funding Source: UKRI
  10. Wellcome Trust [104802/Z/14/Z] Funding Source: Wellcome Trust

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Adoptive cell transfer using chimeric antigen receptors (CAR) has emerged as one of the most promising new therapeutic modalities for patients with relapsed or refractory B-cell malignancies. Thus far, results in patients with advanced solid tumors have proven disappointing. Constitutive tonic signaling in the absence of ligand is an increasingly recognized complication when deploying these synthetic fusion receptors and can be a cause of poor antitumor efficacy, impaired survival, and reduced persistence in vivo. In parallel, ligand-dependent tonic signaling can mediate toxicity and promote T-cell anergy, exhaustion, and activation-induced cell death. Here, we review the mechanisms underpinning CAR tonic signaling and highlight the wide variety of effects that can emerge after making subtle structural changes or altering the methodology of CAR transduction. We highlight strategies to prevent unconstrained tonic signaling and address its deleterious consequences. We also frame this phenomenon in the context of endogenous TCR tonic signaling, which has been shown to regulate peripheral tolerance, facilitate the targeting of foreign antigens, and suggest opportunities to coopt ligand-dependent CAR tonic signaling to facilitate in vivo persistence and efficacy. (C) 2018 AACR.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据