4.7 Review

Ex vivo expansion of hematopoietic stem cells

期刊

SCIENCE CHINA-LIFE SCIENCES
卷 58, 期 9, 页码 839-853

出版社

SCIENCE PRESS
DOI: 10.1007/s11427-015-4895-3

关键词

ex vivo expansion; hematopoietic stem cells; niche; signal transduction; cord blood; transplantation; SCID-repopulating cell; genome editing; CRISPR/Cas9

类别

资金

  1. National Institutes of Health [1R01CA172268]
  2. Leukemia & Lymphoma Society [1024-14, TRP-6024-14]
  3. March of Dimes Foundation [1-FY14-201]
  4. Cancer Prevention and Research Institute of Texas [RP140402]
  5. Taishan Scholar Program

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Ex vivo expansion of hematopoietic stem cells (HSCs) would benefit clinical applications in several aspects, to improve patient survival, utilize cord blood stem cells for adult applications, and selectively propagate stem cell populations after genetic manipulation. In this review we summarize and discuss recent advances in the culture systems of mouse and human HSCs, which include stroma/HSC co-culture, continuous perfusion and fed-batch cultures, and those supplemented with extrinsic ligands, membrane transportable transcription factors, complement components, protein modification enzymes, metabolites, or small molecule chemicals. Some of the expansion systems have been tested in clinical trials. The optimal condition for ex vivo expansion of the primitive and functional human HSCs is still under development. An improved understanding of the mechanisms for HSC cell fate determination and the HSC culture characteristics will guide development of new strategies to overcome difficulties. In the future, development of a combination treatment regimen with agents that enhance self-renewal, block differentiation, and improve homing will be critical. Methods to enhance yields and lower cost during collection and processing should be employed. The employment of an efficient system for ex vivo expansion of HSCs will facilitate the further development of novel strategies for cell and gene therapies including genome editing.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据