4.6 Review

Endoplasmic Reticulum Stress and the Unfolded Protein Response: Targeting the Achilles Heel of Multiple Myeloma

期刊

MOLECULAR CANCER THERAPEUTICS
卷 12, 期 6, 页码 831-843

出版社

AMER ASSOC CANCER RESEARCH
DOI: 10.1158/1535-7163.MCT-12-0782

关键词

-

类别

资金

  1. Science Foundation Ireland [09/RFP/BIC2371]
  2. Health Research Board [HRA/2009/59]
  3. Breast Cancer Campaign [2010NovPR13]
  4. Irish Cancer Society Scholarship [CRS10VIN]
  5. Science Foundation Ireland (SFI) [09/RFP/BIC2371] Funding Source: Science Foundation Ireland (SFI)
  6. Health Research Board (HRB) [HRA-2009-59] Funding Source: Health Research Board (HRB)

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Multiple myeloma is characterized by the malignant proliferating antibody-producing plasma cells in the bone marrow. Despite recent advances in therapy that improve the survival of patients, multiple myeloma remains incurable and therapy resistance is the major factor causing lethality. Clearly, more effective treatments are necessary. In recent years it has become apparent that, as highly secretory antibody-producing cells, multiple myeloma cells require an increased capacity to cope with unfolded proteins and are particularly sensitive to compounds targeting proteostasis such as proteasome inhibitors, which represent one of the most prominent new therapeutic strategies. Because of the increased requirement for dealing with secretory proteins within the endoplasmic reticulum, multiple myeloma cells are heavily reliant for survival on a set of signaling pathways, known as the unfolded protein response (UPR). Thus, directly targeting the UPR emerges as a new promising therapeutic strategy. Here, we provide an overview of the current understanding of the UPR signaling in cancer, and outline its important role in myeloma pathogenesis and treatment. We discuss new therapeutic approaches based on targeting the protein quality control machinery and particularly the IRE1 alpha/XBP1 axis of the UPR.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据