4.6 Article

A Role for Homologous Recombination and Abnormal Cell-Cycle Progression in Radioresistance of Glioma-Initiating Cells

期刊

MOLECULAR CANCER THERAPEUTICS
卷 11, 期 9, 页码 1863-1872

出版社

AMER ASSOC CANCER RESEARCH
DOI: 10.1158/1535-7163.MCT-11-1044

关键词

-

类别

资金

  1. Briz Brain and Spinal Foundation
  2. National Health and Medical Research Council of Australia

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Glioblastoma multiforme (GBM) is the most common form of brain tumor with a poor prognosis and resistance to radiotherapy. Recent evidence suggests that glioma-initiating cells play a central role in radioresistance through DNA damage checkpoint activation and enhanced DNA repair. To investigate this in more detail, we compared the DNA damage response in nontumor forming neural progenitor cells (NPC) and glioma-initiating cells isolated from GBM patient specimens. As observed for GBM tumors, initial characterization showed that glioma-initiating cells have long-term self-renewal capacity. They express markers identical to NPCs and have the ability to form tumors in an animal model. In addition, these cells are radioresistant to varying degrees, which could not be explained by enhanced nonhomologous end joining (NHEJ). Indeed, NHEJ in glioma-initiating cells was equivalent, or in some cases reduced, as compared with NPCs. However, there was evidence for more efficient homologous recombination repair in glioma-initiating cells. We did not observe a prolonged cell cycle nor enhanced basal activation of checkpoint proteins as reported previously. Rather, cell-cycle defects in the G(1)-S and S-phase checkpoints were observed by determining entry into S-phase and radioresistant DNA synthesis following irradiation. These data suggest that homologous recombination and cell-cycle checkpoint abnormalities may contribute to the radioresistance of glioma-initiating cells and that both processes may be suitable targets for therapy. Mol Cancer Ther; 11(9); 1863-72. (C) 2012 AACR.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据