4.6 Article

In vivo target-specific activatable near-infrared optical labeling of humanized monoclonal antibodies

期刊

MOLECULAR CANCER THERAPEUTICS
卷 8, 期 1, 页码 232-239

出版社

AMER ASSOC CANCER RESEARCH
DOI: 10.1158/1535-7163.MCT-08-0862

关键词

-

类别

资金

  1. Intramural Research Program of the NIH, National Cancer Institute, Center for Cancer Research
  2. NATIONAL CANCER INSTITUTE [ZIABC010656, ZIABC010657] Funding Source: NIH RePORTER

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Imaging with labeled monoclonal antibodies may be useful in detecting, staging, and monitoring tumors. Despite their high affinity and specificity, a critical limitation of antibody imaging is the high background signal due to prolonged clearance from the blood, which reduces the tumor-to-background ratio. To address this problem, we developed a molecular imaging probe consisting of multiple self-quenching fluorophores [Cy5.5 or Alexa Fluor 680 (Alexa680)] conjugated to a monoclonal antibody (trastuzumab) to synthesize Tra-Cy5.5(SQ) or Tra-Alexa680(SQ), respectively. This agent only becomes fluorescently active after cellular internalization but is quenched in the unbound state leading to high tumor-to-background ratios. The in vitro quenching capacity for both conjugates was similar to 9-fold. In vivo imaging experiments were done in mice bearing both 3T3/HER-2(+) and BALB/3T3/ZsGreen/HER-2(-) xenografts. Tra-Alexa680(SQ) produced specific enhancement in the 3T3/HER-2(+) tumors but not in the HER-2(-) control tumors. However, Tra-Cy5.5(SQ) produced nonspecific enhancement in both 3T3/HER-2(+) and control tumors. In conclusion, whereas Cy5.5-conjugates produced nonspecific results as well as rapid liver accumulation, conjugating multiple Alexa680 molecules to a single monoclonal antibody resulted in a near-infrared optical agent that activated within specific target tumors with high tumor-to-background ratio with considerable potential for clinical translation. [Mol Cancer Ther 2009;8(1):232-9]

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据