4.6 Article

Intrinsically lower AKT, mammalian target of rapamycin, and hypoxia-inducible factor activity correlates with increased sensitivity to 2-deoxy-D-glucose under hypoxia in lung cancer cell lines

期刊

MOLECULAR CANCER THERAPEUTICS
卷 7, 期 6, 页码 1506-1513

出版社

AMER ASSOC CANCER RESEARCH
DOI: 10.1158/1535-7163.MCT-07-2334

关键词

-

类别

资金

  1. NATIONAL CANCER INSTITUTE [R01CA037109] Funding Source: NIH RePORTER
  2. NCI NIH HHS [R01 CA037109, R01 CA037109-19, R01CA037109] Funding Source: Medline

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Down-regulation by small interfering RNA or absence of hypoxia-inducible factor (HIF-1 alpha) has been shown to lead to increased sensitivity to glycolytic inhibitors in hypoxic tumor cells. In surveying a number of tumor types for differences in intrinsic levels of HIF under hypoxia, we find that the reduction of the upstream pathways of HIF, AKT, and mammalian target of rapamycin (mTOR) correlates with increased toxic effects of 2-deoxy-D-glucose (2-DG) in lung cancer cell lines when treated under hypoxia. Because HIF-1 alpha translation is regulated by mTOR, we examined the effects of blocking mTOR under hypoxia with an analogue of rapamycin (CCI-779) in those cell lines that showed increased mTOR and AKT activity and found that HIF-1 alpha down-regulation coincided with increased 2-DG killing. CCI-779, however, was ineffective in increasing 2-DG toxicity in cell lines that did not express HIF. These results support the hypothesis that although mTOR inhibition leads to the blockage of numerous downstream targets, CCI-779 increases the toxicity of 2-DG in hypoxic cells through down-regulation of HIF-1 alpha. Overall, our findings show that CCI-779 hypersensitizes hypoxic tumor cells to 2-DG and suggests that the intrinsic expression of AKT, mTOR, and HIF in lung cancer, as well as other tumor types, may be important in dictating the decision on how best to use 2-DG alone or in combination with CCI-799 to kill hypoxic tumor cells clinically.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据